|
The Enneads.
". . . [T]he distribution of evil to the
opposite classes of men: the good go bare while the wicked
are rich: all that human need demands, the least deserving
have in abundance; it is they that rule . . ."1a
OLD TESTAMENT
"No one can ever escape the suffering
entailed by ill deeds done:
the divine law is ineluctable,
carrying bound up, as one with it, the fore-ordained execution
of its doom."1b
"We cannot . . . refer all that exists to
Reason-Principle inherent in the seed of things
(spermatic Reasons); the universe is to be traced further back,
to the more primal forces, to the principles by which that seed
itself takes shape. . ."1c
LEIBNIZ
". . . [T]he Primals (the first
'Categories') are seen to be: Intellectual-Principle;
Existence: Difference; Identity; we must include also
Motion and Rest: Motion provides for the intellectual
act, Rest preserves identity as Difference gives at once
a Knower and a Known, for, failing this, all is one, and
silent."1d
352
"The Platonic Parmenides is more exact;
the distinction is made between the Primal One, a
strictly pure Unity, and a secondary One which is a One-Many
and a third which is a One-and-Many; thus he too in
accordance with our thesis of the Three Kinds."1e
PIERCE
". . . In the assertion 'I am this
particular thing', either the 'particular thing' is distinct
from the assertor -- and there is a false statement -- or it is
included within it, and, at once, multiplicity is asserted:
otherwise the assertion is 'I am what I am', or 'I am I'."1f
DESCARTES
"Consciousness . . . is a
conperception, an act exercised upon a manifold: and
even intellection . . . implies that the agent turns back
upon itself, upon a manifold, then. If that agent says no
more than 'I am a being', it speaks (by the implied
dualism) as a discoverer of the extern; and rightly so, for
being is a manifold . . ."1g
HEGEL
"But Soul is not in the universe, on the
contrary the universe is in the Soul; bodily
substance is not a place to the Soul; Soul is contained in
Intellectual-Principle and is the container of body. The
Intellectual-Principle in turn is contained in something else; but
that prior principle has nothing in which to be: the First is
therefore in nothing, and, therefore, nowhere. But all the rest
must be somewhere; and where but in the First?"1h
"As in Soul (principle of Life)
so in Divine Mind (principle of Idea) there is this
infinitude of recurring generative powers . . ."1i
KANT
" . . . [I]ntellect, to
act at all, must inevitably comport difference with identity;
otherwise it could not distinguish itself from its object
by standing apart from it, nor could it ever be aware of the
realm of things whose existence demands otherness, nor could
there be so much as a duality."1j
HEGEL
|